With all the carnage and turmoil going on these past few days, I going to step up and out here and make a statement that may or may not be popular, but Truth is Truth and the more I avoid stating it, the less sleep I’ll get.
And I need sleep. I’ll need more sleep come September.
Don’t have me post any flag color over my profile picture anytime soon after any tragic attack or a blue ribbon, a pink ribbon, or any other color ribbon. Here’s why:
1) I did not once see a profile pic modifying app utilized to reflect the flag of either Iraq nor Turkey. Yet both countries suffered a higher casualty rate than the 2015 Belgium attack. I saw French flag and Belgium flag profile pics after their respected tragedies. Where was the Yemen flag? The Malaysian flag? The Turkish flag? The Iraqi flag? This double-standard about which terrorist related tragedy gets remembered and which terrorist related tragedy gets ignored is not only sickening, but it is perhaps a major factor of why so much anger and tension is up in the air now.
2) I’m the only Lim grandson who is NOT a law enforcement officer. (Yet, I work in courts; still law related) Any attack against police officers is not acceptable. On the flip side, lack of accountability and not rooting out the so-called “bad apples” in law enforcement is also not acceptable. As tragic as the Dallas incident is, I was not surprised that it happened. In fact my only shock was that it didn’t happen sooner. (More on karma later)
3) Please refer to my blogpost about the uselessness of sending “thoughts and prayers” during any tragic aftermath. Even as a trained prayer chaplain and a practitioner in training, I find the gesture to be nothing more than an empty and useless cliché. “Our hearts, thoughts and prayers goes out to ____________.” What exactly does that mean?
I’ve said this on a post to the New Thought leaders: the root of the problem isn’t so much a racial and white supremacy thing. Our real problem is the fact that we collectively created a world that no longer recognize the humanity within a Universe that created Divine souls. Do you see the disparity? In fact, that source of comfort, that source of healing, that source of keeping such tragic events from becoming a much worse-case scenario is the Divinity within not some of us, but all of us. So if the Divinity within can keep these situations from getting worse, provides healing and comfort, why can’t the Divinity within prevent such events from happening in the first place?
One of the many orders of The Universe: Free Will. We’re given dominion over our personal universe. Some people call it Weltanschauung, or world view. That world view affects the choices and decisions we make. We’re solely responsible in deciding what it is. Then we react accordingly with the power to change that world outlook at any given time, yet we choose not to change. A direct corollary to free will is personal responsibility.
We are solely responsible for everything in our lives. The problem is the vast majority refuses to take and accept responsibility for their lives.
Christians want to lay blame to Satan, Buddhists, Muslims, and atheists. (Should I add “members of the LGBT community too?”)
Republicans want to blame Democrats; Democrats want to blame Republican.
98% of the general population wants to blame the top 2% wealthiest.
Racists wants to blame anyone and everyone who’s not WASP.
Rich folks want to blame poor folks; poor folks want to blame rich folks.
See where humanity gets lost?
Even when olive branches are being extended, people will still chose to dehumanize those who disagrees with them. A Congressional member should never blame and threaten the life of the President of the United States on social media after a tragedy. Other people are flashing their academic credential as some sort of trump (no pun intended) card that they are entitled to be heard and the rest should shut up and listen to them. Accusations fly across each other in social media about being anti-this and pro-that all because of the profile pic that’s posted.
On Karma:
We always think of reaping and sowing to be that of each person and it is. However oftentimes an institution reaps and sows the karmic debt of an individual within that institution. That includes the institution of law enforcement. We may see specific names of police officers who are placed on trial for killing someone and then a short time later another officer falls in the line of duty. Consider this:
In 2009 after Oscar Grant was killed by Johanne Mehserles on New Years Day, an officer with BART Police, three Oakland police officers were killed in the line of duty later in March that year. Though Grant was killed in Oakland, the Oakland Police Department was not involved in the Oscar Grant shooting, yet three officers were killed a short time later.
More recently in 2014 after Eric Garner died of a choke hold by Officer Pantaleo of the New York City Police, Officers Ramos and Liu were killed in the line of duty.
In both cases, officers NOT involved in the civilian killings were killed in the line of duty a short time afterwards. Karma may or may not have affected the officers who were directly involved, but it caught up with the institution. That’s why it’s imperative that the institution of law enforcement must “clean house” of all the “bad apples.” When it doesn’t happen such tragic events occur.
Most recent this week, what did Dallas Police and Dallas Rapid Transit Police have to do with Louisiana or Minnesota where Sterling and Castile were killed such that 5 of their officers were killed in the line of duty? Even closer to home, what did Oakland PD have to do with it to with it such that their station was vandalized and set on fire? More so, what did Oakland do to have their traffic and transit disrupted? Reaping and sowing on an institutional level. Hence why the importance of transparent accountability.
This isn’t just limited to the institution of law enforcement. Does anyone remember Larry Gene Ashbrook? Seven people were killed at his hand when he shot up a Christian rally at Wedgewood Baptist Church back in 1999. During that period, various church scandals, both financial, and sexual had surfaced significantly, specifically when many molestation victims came forward against the Catholic Church. Again what did a Baptist church in Texas have to do with the Catholic Church? Institutional karma.
Therefore, I wasn’t surprised at the Dallas shootings. I was more surprised that it didn’t happen sooner elsewhere during past protests.
If it’s reaping and sowing, what about September 11?
People forgot about the United Nations World Conference on Racism that took place from August 31-September 8, 2001. Actually people didn't even know such a conference took place in the first place. That same conference where the United States, Canada, and Israel walked out on because calling Israel out for their atrocities against the Palestinians was considered unacceptable.
What happened less than a week later?
Not only was I not surprised at an event like September 11, I AM surprised that more incidents hasn’t followed. We can beef up security measures all we want, but how long can one hold a beach ball beneath the surface of water? It’s only a matter of time before the ball pops up to the surface. Besides, beefing up security is about as effective and shallow as sending out prayers after a tragedy occurs. It inconvenience the general public who too felt the impact of the tragic event, and like I stated earlier, that same general public becomes very hungry for a scapegoat. They begin to blame the “others.” Look at this current presidential election this year.
Scapegoating, finger pointing, racism, classism, and bullying is dehumanizing. This discontent that a lot of people are expressing is the result of Divinity repressed by the lack of acknowledgement of one's humanity. What does that mean? It means we’re Divine beings whose channels of expression is blocked and limited because we created a world that fails to recognize humanity. The blockage and limitation is the source of our discontent. If we fail to acknowledge one’s humanity, how would we recognize their Divinity? (Short answer: YOU DON’T)
Once again, it’s all about choice. The choice I make about what I think and how I’ll react to what’s been going on. It’s the choice of the powers that be on making a commitment to finding solutions and how to go about it. (That choice is also ours as well as theirs) It’s choosing on how we’ll accept and process the emotions that are felt in the face of all that occurred this week, but it all narrows to choice.
The thing is, we know that is true, but then we DON’T know. At least not enough to remember at key moments. It’s like having Divine amnesia. We forget who we are then get caught up in all these twists and turns that tells us we're not even human, let alone Divine. People oppress others because they forgot. People are oppressed because they too forgot.
Divine amnesia also creates a scarcity consciousness. The Universe provides and gives, yet we scramble and even kill for what we considered as limited. We dehumanize and demonize those that we take those resources from in order to justify the taking of those resources. Yet if we remember our Divine identity, it doesn't have to be this way.
Or more accurately, WE oppress others because WE forgot. WE get oppressed because WE forgot.
Remembering is a choice, remember that.
The Faith Entry
While personal development and the performing arts is important to Jarrett, his church life is just as important. Here are notes, commentary and personal observations on the religious institutions as he embarks on his spiritual journey. For his other insights on acting, performing, and personal development, goto his Jia You Site.
08 July, 2016
18 April, 2016
23 March, 2016
No Flag Photos Here
Since I began work with the California Judicial Council and working in one of the California State buildings, security and terrorism awareness is a common forefront day-in-day-out routine. There are days when our office is targeted by numerous causes and protests, therefore security issues is part of the job description.
As someone who's working on a graduate/advanced credential in metaphysics and theology, the possibility of full-time clergy work is well...for no lack of a better term, POSSIBLE for me. I'm currently pursuing a Masters of Theological Studies degree as well as obtaining a Divine Science practitioners' credential. I currently serve as one of the local prayer chaplains at my Unity Church.
Since I have begun work with the CJC back in 2014, I've seen and witness several terrorist attacks worldwide that affected my work practices at the office. It's sad to see tragic events occurring, but at the same time peoples reactions to the event creates more of a cynical reaction within me more than anything else.
I'll say that as a prayer chaplain, if there's anything more annoying than nails on the chalkboard annoyance, it is the uniform aftermath of a tragedy such as a terrorist event, a natural disaster, or a mass shooting:
"OUR PRAYERS GOES OUT TO _________"
...along with a profile photo donning the colors of the flag of the country the event occurred in.
Why?
My minister/mentor has a term she uses for such situations:
"Why secure the barn NOW after the herd already escaped?"
In other words, I'm annoyed at the "too little too late" reaction that for the most part, is a totally useless reaction.
I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. I've given up my auto back in 2013 and utilize BART 90% of the time getting around. During that time, I've experienced a strike that grounded me, two sets of fare hikes including one this year, people bullying other people off of seats including myself and my pregnant wife, aggressive solicitors harassing passengers, broken escalators, delayed trains, closed restrooms, stranded passengers, and management who placed no protocol in preparing for the infrastructure scheduled decline to the point that "bus bridges" are put in place because tracks and routes are shut down.
But hey, BART "apologizes for the inconvenience," so it's OK.
(Please Note SARCASM)
Again a useless response that does little to no good for those who are affected. On top of that, BART management and employees are still on track for monetary bonuses this year in spite of all I just said about the system, so apparently apologizing for the inconvenience works for them.
So as a prayer chaplain, please excuse me if you see my eyes roll when someone requests that I'll "pray for the tragedy of the day."
See, here's the thing I learned from my training as a prayer chaplain:
1) We're always in a state of prayer
2) Believe it or not, someone or collectively a group was praying for such tragedies. Not necessarily by praying "God please let this happen" per se, but by remaining in a state of worry and paranoia. People need to understand that "Oh God, DON'T LET _____HAPPEN" creates the same results as "God please let this happen."
3) All tragedies are self-imposed. There was a point of choice or decision made by someone or a group of folks long before the event that triggered the event.
I did not carry a "Je Suis Charlie" sign in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo shooting. Knowing the history of the organization, knowing that the publisher who was killed had a personal bodyguard, this was an event that even the dumbest of dumbasses could see coming miles away. Yet the Facebook sheeps showed their true colors by French-coloring their profile pics and/or posting the "Je Suis Charlie" slogan on their profile. People came out in droves to various French locations worldwide and held vigils.
Certainly did not prevent the attacks in France that occurred ten months later.
Truth be told, people in key positions are not committed to preventing such tragedies, and they even thrive when Facebookers react with profile changes in the aftermath. Why? It demonstrates a sheep mentality rather than a leadership mentality.
As a prayer chaplain, I encourage people to conduct prayer in such a way to tap into their inner Divine Christ quality, that Divine leader within. Praying in reaction to tragedies undermines that. It voluntarily gives more power away to the event, and that's what certain people wants. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I wouldn't be surprised if certain people actually relish when such event happens.
So now as people shade their profile pics in the Belgium colors, I continue to mind my own business and to tap into Divine Source. 1) I help others best when I operate from "OVERFLOW" mode, and 2) Sending thoughts and prayers with a changed profile picture is an overused cliche. Divinity gives more of what we ask for, so why ask for more cliches?
As someone who's working on a graduate/advanced credential in metaphysics and theology, the possibility of full-time clergy work is well...for no lack of a better term, POSSIBLE for me. I'm currently pursuing a Masters of Theological Studies degree as well as obtaining a Divine Science practitioners' credential. I currently serve as one of the local prayer chaplains at my Unity Church.
Since I have begun work with the CJC back in 2014, I've seen and witness several terrorist attacks worldwide that affected my work practices at the office. It's sad to see tragic events occurring, but at the same time peoples reactions to the event creates more of a cynical reaction within me more than anything else.
I'll say that as a prayer chaplain, if there's anything more annoying than nails on the chalkboard annoyance, it is the uniform aftermath of a tragedy such as a terrorist event, a natural disaster, or a mass shooting:
"OUR PRAYERS GOES OUT TO _________"
...along with a profile photo donning the colors of the flag of the country the event occurred in.
Why?
My minister/mentor has a term she uses for such situations:
"Why secure the barn NOW after the herd already escaped?"
In other words, I'm annoyed at the "too little too late" reaction that for the most part, is a totally useless reaction.
I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. I've given up my auto back in 2013 and utilize BART 90% of the time getting around. During that time, I've experienced a strike that grounded me, two sets of fare hikes including one this year, people bullying other people off of seats including myself and my pregnant wife, aggressive solicitors harassing passengers, broken escalators, delayed trains, closed restrooms, stranded passengers, and management who placed no protocol in preparing for the infrastructure scheduled decline to the point that "bus bridges" are put in place because tracks and routes are shut down.
But hey, BART "apologizes for the inconvenience," so it's OK.
(Please Note SARCASM)
Again a useless response that does little to no good for those who are affected. On top of that, BART management and employees are still on track for monetary bonuses this year in spite of all I just said about the system, so apparently apologizing for the inconvenience works for them.
So as a prayer chaplain, please excuse me if you see my eyes roll when someone requests that I'll "pray for the tragedy of the day."
See, here's the thing I learned from my training as a prayer chaplain:
1) We're always in a state of prayer
2) Believe it or not, someone or collectively a group was praying for such tragedies. Not necessarily by praying "God please let this happen" per se, but by remaining in a state of worry and paranoia. People need to understand that "Oh God, DON'T LET _____HAPPEN" creates the same results as "God please let this happen."
3) All tragedies are self-imposed. There was a point of choice or decision made by someone or a group of folks long before the event that triggered the event.
I did not carry a "Je Suis Charlie" sign in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo shooting. Knowing the history of the organization, knowing that the publisher who was killed had a personal bodyguard, this was an event that even the dumbest of dumbasses could see coming miles away. Yet the Facebook sheeps showed their true colors by French-coloring their profile pics and/or posting the "Je Suis Charlie" slogan on their profile. People came out in droves to various French locations worldwide and held vigils.
Certainly did not prevent the attacks in France that occurred ten months later.
Truth be told, people in key positions are not committed to preventing such tragedies, and they even thrive when Facebookers react with profile changes in the aftermath. Why? It demonstrates a sheep mentality rather than a leadership mentality.
As a prayer chaplain, I encourage people to conduct prayer in such a way to tap into their inner Divine Christ quality, that Divine leader within. Praying in reaction to tragedies undermines that. It voluntarily gives more power away to the event, and that's what certain people wants. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I wouldn't be surprised if certain people actually relish when such event happens.
So now as people shade their profile pics in the Belgium colors, I continue to mind my own business and to tap into Divine Source. 1) I help others best when I operate from "OVERFLOW" mode, and 2) Sending thoughts and prayers with a changed profile picture is an overused cliche. Divinity gives more of what we ask for, so why ask for more cliches?
08 December, 2015
Once Again Out of Necessity
Dear Dr.
Anna Price, Dr. Robert Price, Dr C Wil Mercer, Dr. Durrell Watkins, Mr. Mark
Hicks, Rev Sherri James, Dr. (Bishop) Barbara King, Rev Donna Caldwell (aka “Mom”), Tuyet
Julie from Facebook Unity Group, and lastly to my beautiful partner in crime
Ireene Joanne:
Back in
1999 when I decided to formally train and pursue acting, I made it adamantly
clear that my intention was to be an actor; not a singer, not a comedian, not a
dancer, but an actor. It was naïve on my
part because learning the foundation of each of those other disciplines would
augment my skills and craft as an actor.
The last thing I viewed myself as was a writer. I felt that there were tons of talented
playwrights and screenwriters out there to create those wonderful roles to
portray and my focus was to develop my acting craft.
A few years
passed and out of sheer frustration, I found myself adding “writer” to my title
along with “actor.” One could only
audition for the “angry Asian guy, the nerd, the Americanized dutiful son
coming out of the closet to immigrants from Asia parents,” and “the villain” for
so much. So I began writing in order to
create roles that I personally would’ve loved to audition for.
I felt
compelled out of necessity to hang my shingle out as a writer as well as an
actor back in 2001-05 when I became a part of the San Francisco Asian American
Theater Company’s New Works Incubator collaborative unit, serving in both
capacities.
Nowadays,
I’m beginning to get that same itchy compelling feeling regarding the teaching
and ministering of New Thought based Truth.
I don’t
consider myself a minister by any means.
In fact in 1997 I spent my entire summer in Asia with The Salvation Army
USA Western Territory Service Corps program.
This was a program where college-aged, early career young adults were assigned to a summertime
mission, oftentimes overseas. A part of the reason for the
program is to compel those in the program to consider becoming a Salvation Army
Officer (minister) and to undergo their Officers Training Program. It was during that trip that I concluded that
I was nowhere near being such material and for the next two years after Service
Corps, I contemplated what to do next in my life. That’s when I returned to school (California State University, Hayward) to finish my
BA in Ethnic Studies and to pursue acting full time after graduation.
I lived the
life of a “true artist” going from one project to the next temp job to the next
gig while attempting to remain “faithful to Christ.” When I say that, I’m talking about the basic
evangelical POV with the concept of Original Sin and the Atonement of Jesus
Christ. I was at one point convinced
that I was going in the “right” direction when I was attending a church that
was pastored by someone who was trained at the infamous NYC Neighborhood
Playhouse (a world famous acting school founded by the legendary acting guru Sanford Meisner) I even attempted
to convince myself that I was going in the right direction as I visited various
mega churches in Singapore, including City Harvest Church, which has been the center of a recent church scandal.
When I
signed up for a personal development class that came highly recommended by an
acting colleague in 2007, my spiritual life started taking drastic and sudden
abrupt turns. Actually my life in
general began to take drastic sudden abrupt turns afterwards.
The further
down the personal development rabbit hole I traveled, the more materials from
the New Thought Movement I began to study, unaware what New Thought was. The first “A-ha” moment for me was when I
first read Eric Butterworth’s Discover The Power Within You back in
2010-11. This was a book that to me,
reconciled this wedge I felt between my initial beliefs in Evangelical
Christianity and the personal development courses I underwent from 2007-11.
Soon
afterwards, I dug up an older book I had placed in storage because a Sunday
school teacher told me to burn it, and I don’t believe in burning books that
people tell me to burn. Back in 1995
when I began to attend church, I came across a book called Transform Your
Life by Dr. Barbara King and was inspired by what I read. As an appreciation for the mentoring I
received from my then Sunday school teacher, I gave him a copy of the book,
only to have it returned to me with the “polite suggestion” for me to burn my
own copy of the book as it was determined that it was not truly a Christian
book per se. I may not have burned it,
but I placed it away from reach over the years both physically and even
mentally. I did not know at that time
that both Dr. Barbara King and Eric
Butterworth were both part of the same theological/philosophical vein.
If there
were such a thing as “geeking-out on New Thought,” that would’ve been perhaps
the most accurate description of me especially after May 2011 when I officially
left the mainstream (Evangelical) Christian church and began attending New
Thought based CENTERS. While clearing out my apartment recently, I
must’ve came across as least $8-10K worth of books and home-study courses on
New Thought, meditation, and law of attraction.
Unfortunately, “geeking-out on New Thought” does not necessarily
guarantee a healthy return on investment from all those courses and books,
in-person courses, and tithes.
Nevertheless I continued to explore the possibility of creating a
teaching/facilitating forum in Singapore and inquired about formal advanced teaching
through Unity School of Christianity only to find out that they were no longer
Unity School of Christianity. The
academic dean at that time inquired about my interest via email and I explained
to him that I was interested in helping plant Practical Christian churches in
Southeast Asia particularly in Singapore.
His response was that they were no longer Unity School of Practical
Christianity, that they discontinued the Masters of Religious Studies program I
was inquiring about, and was I aware that Seicho No Ie is based out of
Japan? Because of the bizarre last reply,
I decided to hold off on looking for another place to pursue advanced studies
in New Thought.
If there
ever was a “bottom” from geeking out in New Thought, it’d probably was back in
the fall of 2013 while receiving a free meal from the local foodbank with a
Joseph Murphy prosperity book in tow.
From that point until now things have finally turned around. Slowly but surely I’ve had meals to thank God
for, a return to full-time employment in 2014, prayer chaplaincy in 2014 with
my local Unity church, a trip to Manila in 2015, and lastly, my new bride in
November 2015. Though there were
numerous spiritual panic and frustration moments, I can now savor situations to
be thankful for. (Although truthfully even in the panic moments are there lots of things to be thankful for)
Eventually,
I contacted the Fillmore College, (Run by Dr. Charlie Smith), Barbara L King School of Ministry, Johnnie Colemon
Theological Seminary, and the Samaritan Institute of Sunshine Cathedral where
I’ve had the privilege of taking courses from both JCTS with Dr. Robert Price and
Samaritan Institute with Dr. Durrell Watkins.
My wife
grew up Catholic and I’ve been very thankful that she has a very open heart
and mind. She became very active with my
Unity church the moment she stepped through the doors. She asks a lot of questions about what the
teachings are and where in the Bible was it based off of. The more we discussed, the more I see the
urgency for this teaching to continue to grow in Southeast Asia. Hence why again that gnawing inside is urging
me on continuing the route to further my studies and plant and grow the movement
there. When I visited her and her family in Manila back in February 2015, I was unable to connect with the Unity center there
because of the travelling distance between the center and where I was staying. I know that counties like the Philippines
and Singapore would gravitate towards the New Thought teachings.
But my
wanting to spread the teachings of New Thought isn’t so much a Southeast Asian
thing. As I type this, we are now
recovering from the aftermath of the shooting that took place in San Bernadino,
California which was a month after another mass killing episode in Paris,
France. People from polarized sides are
coming out of the woodwork debating about what can be the solution to all of
this carnage. For those of us in the New
Thought arena, I present a “what if” scenario:
What if the teachings of New Thought regarding
accepting personal responsibility in both thought and actions became common
knowledge amongst the entire world population instead of it being some sort of debated theory, that
the vast majority of humanity (70% or highter)knew and believed in assuming
self-responsibility for their thought and actions? Would that and could that have
made a difference in either of the two incidents? Would either of the incident have even taken
place in the first place under such a premise?
So you
could see the importance of why the teaching of New Thought should be spread,
not so much as some sort of religious revival, but as a means to empower people
with tools in order to cope, deal, and thrive with life in general. The collective consciousness of humanity currently operates out of a premise of scarcity when in Truth, abundance abounds. Even personally I have a struggle to remind
myself in the Truth of abundance as demonstrated with my food bank visit a couple of years back. It’d
sure would be easier to be reminded if more people were around to remind me,
and that’s the thing about spreading the teachings. The more people learn about what is taught in
New Thought, the larger pool of support you, me, us are surrounded with.
Here’s the
deal with the current world situation.
Nothing that the mediots (media+idiots) present to the public will ever
go away whether they’d be news of the dismal state of affairs or the
corresponding polarized suggested solutions.
We as metaphysicians know it’s an “inside job.” I’ve shared this on one of my assignment submitted
with Dr. Durrell Watkins:
"This is not a humanity problem per se, this
is a Divinity problem. The root cause of all the problems we’re currently
observing is that we created a world where we choose not to acknowledge one
another's humanity within a Universe that created, designed, and wired us to
affirm our Divinity."
Let that
sink in for a bit. In a Universe where
we’re created in the image and likeness of our Creator, we created a world that
doesn’t even acknowledge each other’s humanity, let alone our Divinity. We’ve created this artificial pecking order
on who’s entitled to this artificially scarce resources while treating and
reacting to each other accordingly.
So again I
present this scenario: if we have more of our population aware of an abundant
universe while tapping into this Divine consciousness, honoring each other’s
humanity AND Divinity, while accepting full responsibility for our thoughts and
actions, how much different would everything be?
So how’
bout it…who’s with me in stepping up and spreading the tools to uncover our
Divine self? We’re told to visualize the
end result. What is the end result that
you see of what I proposed? Is it
possible? Then can we
start? What about now?
Who's down?
Who's down?
19 November, 2015
NSNK Indeed.
If I had to rely on a New Year's Resolution to get a book done, it'd take me more than twenty plus years to get it done. Hence why I taken the steps to advocate the concept of taking a daily resolution practice.
Years ago, I was mentored by someone who was an openly unapologetic advocate of the 12 steps program of recovery. (What they were recovering from is irrelevant and their business only) One of his greatest gift he passed along to me was the concept of "Just for Today."
This mentor was able to stay free from his addiction for over a span of 27 years when I met him, so I asked him what exactly did he do and how was he able to get where he was up to that point. I even questioned whether or not he actually had the addiction in the first place. He shared with me his lowest point and situation his addiction led him to and his journey for the 30 years since. (He had about 2-3 years of "finding his way through" so to speak) What he said to me was profound.
"I just decided that JUST FOR TODAY I will not cave into my desire. Then the next day I made that same decision, and then the next day. Now it's been twenty seven years."
So I asked him what if he decided to give into his desire.
"Tomorrow is a new day that I can decide THAT DAY to not give in. But TODAY, I decided that I will not ___________"
That conversation took place in the mid 90s. Actually it took place during the Holiday Season of 1998-99. So he continued to go off on a semi-tangent about New Years Resolutions.
"You know, before I decided to take this One Day at a Time, I used to make New Year's resolutions all the time that I would handle my situation. I'd say, 'this year, I'll handle it.' That'd only last for a week, two weeks, one year it was a whole month. Then I'd give in and thought oh well, I'll just try again next year. That was stupid. I didn't know that my gift of today was all I had for that moment. New Years Resolutions? Stupid, don't work for me. Now daily resolution, if I fail, I can wake up the next day and start over again."
Basically using the elephant analogy, it does something like this: If it was a new year or a time period transition (like a birthday or something) I can resolve to eat an entire elephant. But what my mentor was doing was that for that day and that day only, he was going to eat a certain amount of the elephant. The next day, he decided to eat another portion of the elephant, and so on and so on. Finally at some point many days later, the elephant was completely consumed.
Then he decided to move on to another elephant or another animal per se.
So throughout the years, I decided to write a book on what I was passionate about. I thought of the title, the bylines, the subheader, some of the wittiest lines to include. Then I open my computer and draw total blanks.
If only I decided to keep it simple and just focus on one line at a time, which would lead to one paragraph at a time, which eventually would lead to one page at a time, then one chapter (or section) at a time.
Back in 2009, I was at 189 pounds. Now for someone like myself at 5 feet, 9 inches, that was a little too much. I had enrolled in a 90 Day Goal program which assigned me 4 goals to set and meet at the end of 90 days. One goal was career and/or money oriented, one goal was relationship oriented, one goal was on physical, and the last goal was spiritually oriented. My physical goal was to get to 167 pounds by the end of that 90 days.
On day 90 of that 90 day goal program, I hit a weight of 174. I was seven pounds short of my goal. (Target weight of 167 pounds)
That haunted me throughout the summer of 2009. At the fall of that year (like September) I re-weighed myself (yes, I stop weighing myself after that last weigh-in back in May) and noticed I was up to 178. So I got construction paper out, drew with crayons a photo of a scale with feet on them (and I wrote "MY FEET" with arrows pointed at the haphazardly drawn pair of feet) with the scale saying "167" Next to that, I wrote "December 31, 2009 NSNK" "NSNK" means "no sh*t, no kidding." It was sort of a mantra during that 90 day period when my coach would issue an ultimatum.
I had book a trip to Asia leaving the states on December 6, and returning January 10, 2010. Yes I was going to spend an entire month in Asia. I had plans to keep my eating to a minimum and actually sign up for a single month membership at one of the gyms in Singapore where I was scheduled to stay for the 2.5 weeks of the month there. That was curtailed when my back went out on the first morning in Hong Kong. I was supposed to meet my friend in Hong Kong for dim sum that first day I arrived, but my back went out on me that day. I was taken to a local Dit Dat specialist. (Traditional Chinese Medicine Orthopedics) who placed me to bedrest the next 48 hours. Sadly, I missed the meeting and had the doctor explained to her on the phone why I was unable to meet her at the bus station. Luckily my back recovered somewhat to be able to make the flight to Singapore. After a couple of days, I booked a trip to Davao City, Philippines in anticipation of spending Christmas with my girlfriend and her family. When she inquired where was I going to stay accommodation wise, I realized the Christmas plans were not going to happen, so I rescheduled the whole trip and cut it short. I only scheduled 4 days there instead of the initially planned 10. On the evening of the first day in Davao, I ended up with food poisoning. The following day my entire food intake was a bottle of Sprite. The following day was my flight out. Upon returning to Singapore, I was stopped by the health ministry because my body scan indicated a fever and I was coming out of the budget terminal. It was "recommended" that I remain at my hotel for another 72 hours, which included Christmas, so that cancelled out the option 2 Christmas plans. Finally I was able to take a bus tour of Malaysia two days after Christmas, to return to Singapore on the 30th. Luckily there was nothing out of the ordinary there and I was able to enjoy the local cuisine. On New Years Eve, I met my friends for a NYE dinner and decided to head to our favorite dessert place to kick off the New Year. It was closed. The only spot opened was a nearby Mc Donalds. Knowing that I was on a 12 year streak of not eating McDonalds food, my friends only ordered a Coke for me and did not allow me to eat any of their food. Upon returning to the hotel, I asked for a scale and was given a digital scale in the metric system. It read "74.5" I then went online to convert the weight. It was 164.24 pounds. (2 1/2 ahead of my "NSNK" goal)
Be careful what is declared because it'll happen sooner or later, and in this case it happened in such a way that was not the most comfortable nor pleasant way.
Now, instead of going through with all that, I could've broken things down to a daily resolution. Today I'll eat this and do this XYZ workout. Then the next day I'll eat that, then do the ABC workout. The following day, I'll splurge and enjoy this dessert. The following day, 2 meals with just veggies, and dinner with chicken and goto yoga. At some point, I'll get to that 167 range and most likely feel good physically about myself too.
Just one moment at a time.
Years ago, I was mentored by someone who was an openly unapologetic advocate of the 12 steps program of recovery. (What they were recovering from is irrelevant and their business only) One of his greatest gift he passed along to me was the concept of "Just for Today."
This mentor was able to stay free from his addiction for over a span of 27 years when I met him, so I asked him what exactly did he do and how was he able to get where he was up to that point. I even questioned whether or not he actually had the addiction in the first place. He shared with me his lowest point and situation his addiction led him to and his journey for the 30 years since. (He had about 2-3 years of "finding his way through" so to speak) What he said to me was profound.
"I just decided that JUST FOR TODAY I will not cave into my desire. Then the next day I made that same decision, and then the next day. Now it's been twenty seven years."
So I asked him what if he decided to give into his desire.
"Tomorrow is a new day that I can decide THAT DAY to not give in. But TODAY, I decided that I will not ___________"
That conversation took place in the mid 90s. Actually it took place during the Holiday Season of 1998-99. So he continued to go off on a semi-tangent about New Years Resolutions.
"You know, before I decided to take this One Day at a Time, I used to make New Year's resolutions all the time that I would handle my situation. I'd say, 'this year, I'll handle it.' That'd only last for a week, two weeks, one year it was a whole month. Then I'd give in and thought oh well, I'll just try again next year. That was stupid. I didn't know that my gift of today was all I had for that moment. New Years Resolutions? Stupid, don't work for me. Now daily resolution, if I fail, I can wake up the next day and start over again."
Basically using the elephant analogy, it does something like this: If it was a new year or a time period transition (like a birthday or something) I can resolve to eat an entire elephant. But what my mentor was doing was that for that day and that day only, he was going to eat a certain amount of the elephant. The next day, he decided to eat another portion of the elephant, and so on and so on. Finally at some point many days later, the elephant was completely consumed.
Then he decided to move on to another elephant or another animal per se.
So throughout the years, I decided to write a book on what I was passionate about. I thought of the title, the bylines, the subheader, some of the wittiest lines to include. Then I open my computer and draw total blanks.
If only I decided to keep it simple and just focus on one line at a time, which would lead to one paragraph at a time, which eventually would lead to one page at a time, then one chapter (or section) at a time.
Back in 2009, I was at 189 pounds. Now for someone like myself at 5 feet, 9 inches, that was a little too much. I had enrolled in a 90 Day Goal program which assigned me 4 goals to set and meet at the end of 90 days. One goal was career and/or money oriented, one goal was relationship oriented, one goal was on physical, and the last goal was spiritually oriented. My physical goal was to get to 167 pounds by the end of that 90 days.
On day 90 of that 90 day goal program, I hit a weight of 174. I was seven pounds short of my goal. (Target weight of 167 pounds)
That haunted me throughout the summer of 2009. At the fall of that year (like September) I re-weighed myself (yes, I stop weighing myself after that last weigh-in back in May) and noticed I was up to 178. So I got construction paper out, drew with crayons a photo of a scale with feet on them (and I wrote "MY FEET" with arrows pointed at the haphazardly drawn pair of feet) with the scale saying "167" Next to that, I wrote "December 31, 2009 NSNK" "NSNK" means "no sh*t, no kidding." It was sort of a mantra during that 90 day period when my coach would issue an ultimatum.
I had book a trip to Asia leaving the states on December 6, and returning January 10, 2010. Yes I was going to spend an entire month in Asia. I had plans to keep my eating to a minimum and actually sign up for a single month membership at one of the gyms in Singapore where I was scheduled to stay for the 2.5 weeks of the month there. That was curtailed when my back went out on the first morning in Hong Kong. I was supposed to meet my friend in Hong Kong for dim sum that first day I arrived, but my back went out on me that day. I was taken to a local Dit Dat specialist. (Traditional Chinese Medicine Orthopedics) who placed me to bedrest the next 48 hours. Sadly, I missed the meeting and had the doctor explained to her on the phone why I was unable to meet her at the bus station. Luckily my back recovered somewhat to be able to make the flight to Singapore. After a couple of days, I booked a trip to Davao City, Philippines in anticipation of spending Christmas with my girlfriend and her family. When she inquired where was I going to stay accommodation wise, I realized the Christmas plans were not going to happen, so I rescheduled the whole trip and cut it short. I only scheduled 4 days there instead of the initially planned 10. On the evening of the first day in Davao, I ended up with food poisoning. The following day my entire food intake was a bottle of Sprite. The following day was my flight out. Upon returning to Singapore, I was stopped by the health ministry because my body scan indicated a fever and I was coming out of the budget terminal. It was "recommended" that I remain at my hotel for another 72 hours, which included Christmas, so that cancelled out the option 2 Christmas plans. Finally I was able to take a bus tour of Malaysia two days after Christmas, to return to Singapore on the 30th. Luckily there was nothing out of the ordinary there and I was able to enjoy the local cuisine. On New Years Eve, I met my friends for a NYE dinner and decided to head to our favorite dessert place to kick off the New Year. It was closed. The only spot opened was a nearby Mc Donalds. Knowing that I was on a 12 year streak of not eating McDonalds food, my friends only ordered a Coke for me and did not allow me to eat any of their food. Upon returning to the hotel, I asked for a scale and was given a digital scale in the metric system. It read "74.5" I then went online to convert the weight. It was 164.24 pounds. (2 1/2 ahead of my "NSNK" goal)
Be careful what is declared because it'll happen sooner or later, and in this case it happened in such a way that was not the most comfortable nor pleasant way.
Now, instead of going through with all that, I could've broken things down to a daily resolution. Today I'll eat this and do this XYZ workout. Then the next day I'll eat that, then do the ABC workout. The following day, I'll splurge and enjoy this dessert. The following day, 2 meals with just veggies, and dinner with chicken and goto yoga. At some point, I'll get to that 167 range and most likely feel good physically about myself too.
Just one moment at a time.
06 November, 2015
Sh*tty Conclusion for "C*ty" Harvest Church
People were approaching me about my reaction to the scandal that rocked City Harvest Church in Singapore because of my deep love and appreciation of Singapore, my spiritual background, and the fact that if you were Christian, visited or lived in Singapore, you were expected to have attended at least one service there. Attending a City Harvest Church service was sort of like a "bucket list" item for Singaporean Christians.
Honestly, I have no reaction. Like I stated on the previous post, church scandals will come and go. People place some sort of artificial meaning to the church. It is an enterprise that's no different from a government agency, a business, a school, or any other organization that has people in it. Yes, it is SUPPOSED TO BE the responsibility and function of a church to create an optimal environment for it's attenders to connect with Spirit, Divine, God, ect, but they don't always create such an environment and/or different people have differing needs. I have stated indirectly on almost all my blogs on spirituality that the function of any religious or spiritual institution boils down to 2 functions/purposes:
1) Enable the follower to connect with Spirit
2) Enable the follower to optimize their life experience through the teachings and application of spiritual principles. (See #1)
Hence why I left the mainstream Christian church and embraced New Thought Christianity. It's a lot more challenging to learn and apply in life, but at least the negative dogma of us versus everyone else is out the door.
Let me re-visit my only experience at City Harvest Church to offer a background into my borderline reaction of indifference and jubilation:
In November of 2008, actually Thanksgiving week of 2008, I trekked to Singapore as I've done twice annually from 2005-2010. At that point, I confessed my interest in a young lady whom I've attempted to court from 2006-08 only to find out her interest in me was merely as a shopping tool. (She had a taste for Coach bags) Anyhow, she began to attend church service at City Harvest and invited me to attend service with her one Sunday morning. In the slight possibility of any sliver of hope that our relationship would somehow blossom, I accepted her invitation.
Upon entering the Singapore Expo Centre (where Sunday services were held at that time for both City Harvest aka Sh*tty Harvest Church and Faith Community Baptist Church, aka Fake Community Baptist Church) our seats were covered by an envelope. During the service, the senior pastor Kong introduced a guest speaker from Texas who proceeded to explain the meaning of the envelope. For those who will pledge in the envelope a minimum of at least $1500 SGD, God will prosper them and anyone who doesn't place anything in the envelope and turn in the envelope was going to receive the wrath of God through a devastating financial curse. (The "curse" applied to those who turned in nothing and/or any significant lesser amount) I found that quite disturbing and confused because he was addressing the members of CHC. He didn't leave any explanation on how to apply this to the visitor or guest which was the category I fell into.
At the conclusion of service, I did what I always done when I visited a church for the first time: Introduce myself to the pastor. At that point, I was "handled" by the pastors' bodyguards. Apparently since I did not make an appointment to talk with the pastor, I was forbidden to go near him. I was then continued to be "handled" by the bodyguards (shoved back) It was a shock for me personally to the point that for the remaining part of the trip, I skipped church on Sundays, and upon returning to the States, I was also MIA at my regular church for about a month.
That's my 1st (ONLY) impression of CHC
It is my personal opinion and observation that both megachurches in Singapore (CHC and FCBC) is more showmanship and speak in pseudo-Christianese/Sin-glish rhetoric than actual Christian teaching even for the "standard brand" mainstream Christian "holy-roller" dogma. I personally question the sincerity and integrity of the leadership for both organizations. So in light of the guilty verdicts in Singapore against Kong and the CHC leaders, I simply shrug. As a New Thought practitioner,I don't have issues with how much a minister decides to pay him or herself.
I even predict a much more bigger scandal to emerge out of the FCBC camp, simply because of the "he doth protest too much," rhetoric coming from the pastor. Normally the "s/he doth protest much" rhetoric tends to proceed a scandal of irony and hypocrisy.
If there's ever a true spiritual harvest to emerge out of Singapore, it's a ripe moment to plant seeds of New Thought there. That has been a vision of mine since I finished reading Eric Butterworth's Discover the Power Within You back in 2011. Like I stated, what's categorized as The Prosperity Gospel "heavily borrowed" from New Thought, and The Prosperity Gospel is the dominant Christian ideology/paradigm in Singapore, plus New Thought does have a respect for other faiths including the Hindu, Buddhist, and various local spiritual traditions whereas most other Christians do not.
And yes, I am looking for an excuse to be over there again. I miss my kaya toast, duck rice, teh tarik, and chicken rice!
Honestly, I have no reaction. Like I stated on the previous post, church scandals will come and go. People place some sort of artificial meaning to the church. It is an enterprise that's no different from a government agency, a business, a school, or any other organization that has people in it. Yes, it is SUPPOSED TO BE the responsibility and function of a church to create an optimal environment for it's attenders to connect with Spirit, Divine, God, ect, but they don't always create such an environment and/or different people have differing needs. I have stated indirectly on almost all my blogs on spirituality that the function of any religious or spiritual institution boils down to 2 functions/purposes:
1) Enable the follower to connect with Spirit
2) Enable the follower to optimize their life experience through the teachings and application of spiritual principles. (See #1)
Hence why I left the mainstream Christian church and embraced New Thought Christianity. It's a lot more challenging to learn and apply in life, but at least the negative dogma of us versus everyone else is out the door.
Let me re-visit my only experience at City Harvest Church to offer a background into my borderline reaction of indifference and jubilation:
In November of 2008, actually Thanksgiving week of 2008, I trekked to Singapore as I've done twice annually from 2005-2010. At that point, I confessed my interest in a young lady whom I've attempted to court from 2006-08 only to find out her interest in me was merely as a shopping tool. (She had a taste for Coach bags) Anyhow, she began to attend church service at City Harvest and invited me to attend service with her one Sunday morning. In the slight possibility of any sliver of hope that our relationship would somehow blossom, I accepted her invitation.
Upon entering the Singapore Expo Centre (where Sunday services were held at that time for both City Harvest aka Sh*tty Harvest Church and Faith Community Baptist Church, aka Fake Community Baptist Church) our seats were covered by an envelope. During the service, the senior pastor Kong introduced a guest speaker from Texas who proceeded to explain the meaning of the envelope. For those who will pledge in the envelope a minimum of at least $1500 SGD, God will prosper them and anyone who doesn't place anything in the envelope and turn in the envelope was going to receive the wrath of God through a devastating financial curse. (The "curse" applied to those who turned in nothing and/or any significant lesser amount) I found that quite disturbing and confused because he was addressing the members of CHC. He didn't leave any explanation on how to apply this to the visitor or guest which was the category I fell into.
At the conclusion of service, I did what I always done when I visited a church for the first time: Introduce myself to the pastor. At that point, I was "handled" by the pastors' bodyguards. Apparently since I did not make an appointment to talk with the pastor, I was forbidden to go near him. I was then continued to be "handled" by the bodyguards (shoved back) It was a shock for me personally to the point that for the remaining part of the trip, I skipped church on Sundays, and upon returning to the States, I was also MIA at my regular church for about a month.
That's my 1st (ONLY) impression of CHC
It is my personal opinion and observation that both megachurches in Singapore (CHC and FCBC) is more showmanship and speak in pseudo-Christianese/Sin-glish rhetoric than actual Christian teaching even for the "standard brand" mainstream Christian "holy-roller" dogma. I personally question the sincerity and integrity of the leadership for both organizations. So in light of the guilty verdicts in Singapore against Kong and the CHC leaders, I simply shrug. As a New Thought practitioner,I don't have issues with how much a minister decides to pay him or herself.
I even predict a much more bigger scandal to emerge out of the FCBC camp, simply because of the "he doth protest too much," rhetoric coming from the pastor. Normally the "s/he doth protest much" rhetoric tends to proceed a scandal of irony and hypocrisy.
If there's ever a true spiritual harvest to emerge out of Singapore, it's a ripe moment to plant seeds of New Thought there. That has been a vision of mine since I finished reading Eric Butterworth's Discover the Power Within You back in 2011. Like I stated, what's categorized as The Prosperity Gospel "heavily borrowed" from New Thought, and The Prosperity Gospel is the dominant Christian ideology/paradigm in Singapore, plus New Thought does have a respect for other faiths including the Hindu, Buddhist, and various local spiritual traditions whereas most other Christians do not.
And yes, I am looking for an excuse to be over there again. I miss my kaya toast, duck rice, teh tarik, and chicken rice!
06 September, 2015
Not The First nor Last
The sex scandal in religious circles are as synonymous as violence in pro-football. Just when you think the religious figures begin to settle down, out comes another scandal. Now you can see my reluctance in becoming a full-time minister. I just don't want to get caught up in anything controversial. I know I'm going to have sex when I want it with whom I want it with, and I refuse to apologize when I get it. The very first time I traveled outside the United States, it was with The Salvation Army which was a Christian organization, so I left my royal oats in the sack, and I regret that decision to this very day.
First of all, these two recent high profile sex scandals bored me to tears. Sorry, but there are other worthy news items worth discussing about other than who got caught stalking who. Seriously, there was a high scale corruption case that drew a million protesters out in Kuala Lumpor Malaysia last week and it got little attention from the mediots. Instead it was all about Ashley Madison leaked passwords, Josh Duggar, Subway Sandwiches, and Jared Fogle.
Doesn't the media have more important things to inform the public about?
You have two public self proclaimed "do-gooders" who got caught up in a scandal...actually more than one scandal. For some reason, people love to see a sexual downfall of self professed religious figures. It's like rubbernecking on the freeway during an auto accident. They don't give a shit about whether or not the drivers behind them need to be somewhere, their nosyness is more important.
Likewise, the selfish extreme vengeful activists didn't give a crap other than hurting those who spoke against equal opportunity for marriage. They didn't care about the victims of the sexual crime; they were outed. In the case of Duggar, it was his own sisters. So sexual victims rights took about a step or two backwards because of these self-centered extreme activists who were determined to take out the Duggars just because of the family's beliefs as conservative Christians. That's straight up hypocrisy. Its no better than the Conservatives. When you become so determined in taking out someone who disagrees with you to the point that you victimize others besides your intended target, you set the entire group you're advocating for back because of your selfish behavior, which meant that they inadvertently took about 2-3 steps back on behalf of the LGBT community. You don't publicize the identity of anyone who's been sexually violated, especially if they were underdaged at that time. So they believe that the LGBT lifestyle is "sinful" and "wrong." Does that make it right to out a sexually violated victim? It's wrong on so many fronts. It's a step back on bridging the LGBT community with the conservative religious community, and at this point this episode demonstrates that I shouldn't expect any bridge to be built between these two groups anytime soon. It's a step back on victims rights. And here's the big kicker to all of this: those responsible for leaking out the information may or may not have been members of the LGBT community. They simply leaked the information out just to exploit the Duggars sexual dirt.
Jared Fogle set up a children's charity organization to pretty up his image. He had ulterior motives. So he had the hots for underaged females, and he used his organization as a front to find them. OK. And how was this different from the first church I ever attended?
I was "introduced to Jesus Christ" at a Chinese community church based out of Oakland California. It was headed by a non-Chinese pastor who "felt led to save the Chinese 'HEATHENS.'" I wish I was exaggerating, but unfortunately I'm not. This was a church who utilized "Chinese" on their name, but culture-shamed the community they outreached to. If you attended their church activities for a certain period of time and become absent, someone will be ringing your doorbell from the church, armed with their Bible and with ready to refer to verses to convict you of your "wayward ways."
Eventually this church started a private K-12 Christian school back in the 1970-80s, which still "serves" the Chinese community in the East Bay, but they expanded and moved out of Oakland into one of the East Bay suburbs. All the while, this pastor was "counseling" specific students. He also had the following criteria of those he "counseled:"
1) Female student of the school grade 8-12
2) Parents were immigrants with limited English skills.
3) History of family brokenness such as alcoholism/addiction, ect. amongst the parents.
4) Were also consistent attenders/ preferably full time members of the church
5) Were considered "disciplinary challenged" female students either in school and/or church.
For those of you too dense to "get it," when I say this pastor "counseled" these troubled female students, I meant that he flat out sexually violated them.
In other words, this pastor had a very comfy cushy operation going on there. Even if the girls could've and would've spoken up, (and in the beginning some attempted to) the power structure he created kept his victims at bay. And it was indeed a power structure he took advantage of. He shamed his church of their Chinese heritage so much, they worshiped this guy even to the point of raising money to buy him a car. He was a "can do no wrong" in the eyes of his congregants. Calling him out would've been viewed as a sin by that community. He targeted his victims well because of the reputation of both the student and their families. Their word against his.
Basically Jared Fogle could've taken advice from this pastor. Bear in mind there was no social media during the time the pastor took advantage of those young ladies. This was during the 1980s and 90s, where Asian culture, specifically patriarchal Chinese culture was combined with this conservative independent baptist culture; therefore it wasn't conducive to come forward. Those women basically had nowhere to go. If the situation sounds eerily similar to the situation of the Cosby victims, well yes it's a combination of the power structure and the (lack of) technology and communication resources available then.
So for those who did came forward about the situation, how do you think it was handled? It was handled initially in a very similar way as the Duggars situation. No, not the recent Ashley Madison, but the other situation within the Duggar family. You see, this was a church who also advocated Institute of Basic Life Principles like the Duggars, so the solution to the situation were handled similarly. It was a "God will deliver a solution" to all of this. Even though I don't mention nor identify the church directly, no matter how much you'd "Google" this situation, you will never see any news item on it even though it actually happened and the church is still one of the most prominent Chinese community churches in the San Francisco East Bay Area. The most they did was remove him as pastor after all the damage was done.
I know, I'm an IBLP "alumni." In fact while re-auditing the IBLP seminar 20 years ago, I ran into one of the pastor's past victim. She was taking the courses in order to "heal" her life. So it doesn't surprise me at all that the Duggar family handled their situation the way they did initially. The way IBLP is structured and what it teaches, there's a method to the madness in how to handle every situation. Everything is a "sin" problem, so what does the Bible say about handling "sin?" Confession and forgiveness. Here's the catch: according to the IBLP, not forgiving is also a "sin." So if a Duggar or a pastor or a Fogle "confesses," the person whom they violated, if they too are part of that community or circle, must "forgive" that confessor, otherwise their "sin" of not forgiving is considered to be as bad as the "sin" the confessor confessed. Got all of that? So that's why the Duggar sisters want to move on, and that's why Josh's wife will remain his wife.
As for that Fogle dude...
I guess he should've became a Christian pastor to a community of color where English is a second language; then he could've enjoyed his perversity a little while longer before getting caught.***
***-Please note sarcasm...
As for that church, one of the aftermath footnote about it was the fact that the community was so cultured-shamed to the point that when the replacement pastor was Asian descent like the congregation members, a portion of the church split to find a "more qualified shepherd," to pastor their group. What was the "more qualified?" NOT being Asian.
First of all, these two recent high profile sex scandals bored me to tears. Sorry, but there are other worthy news items worth discussing about other than who got caught stalking who. Seriously, there was a high scale corruption case that drew a million protesters out in Kuala Lumpor Malaysia last week and it got little attention from the mediots. Instead it was all about Ashley Madison leaked passwords, Josh Duggar, Subway Sandwiches, and Jared Fogle.
Doesn't the media have more important things to inform the public about?
You have two public self proclaimed "do-gooders" who got caught up in a scandal...actually more than one scandal. For some reason, people love to see a sexual downfall of self professed religious figures. It's like rubbernecking on the freeway during an auto accident. They don't give a shit about whether or not the drivers behind them need to be somewhere, their nosyness is more important.
Likewise, the selfish extreme vengeful activists didn't give a crap other than hurting those who spoke against equal opportunity for marriage. They didn't care about the victims of the sexual crime; they were outed. In the case of Duggar, it was his own sisters. So sexual victims rights took about a step or two backwards because of these self-centered extreme activists who were determined to take out the Duggars just because of the family's beliefs as conservative Christians. That's straight up hypocrisy. Its no better than the Conservatives. When you become so determined in taking out someone who disagrees with you to the point that you victimize others besides your intended target, you set the entire group you're advocating for back because of your selfish behavior, which meant that they inadvertently took about 2-3 steps back on behalf of the LGBT community. You don't publicize the identity of anyone who's been sexually violated, especially if they were underdaged at that time. So they believe that the LGBT lifestyle is "sinful" and "wrong." Does that make it right to out a sexually violated victim? It's wrong on so many fronts. It's a step back on bridging the LGBT community with the conservative religious community, and at this point this episode demonstrates that I shouldn't expect any bridge to be built between these two groups anytime soon. It's a step back on victims rights. And here's the big kicker to all of this: those responsible for leaking out the information may or may not have been members of the LGBT community. They simply leaked the information out just to exploit the Duggars sexual dirt.
Jared Fogle set up a children's charity organization to pretty up his image. He had ulterior motives. So he had the hots for underaged females, and he used his organization as a front to find them. OK. And how was this different from the first church I ever attended?
I was "introduced to Jesus Christ" at a Chinese community church based out of Oakland California. It was headed by a non-Chinese pastor who "felt led to save the Chinese 'HEATHENS.'" I wish I was exaggerating, but unfortunately I'm not. This was a church who utilized "Chinese" on their name, but culture-shamed the community they outreached to. If you attended their church activities for a certain period of time and become absent, someone will be ringing your doorbell from the church, armed with their Bible and with ready to refer to verses to convict you of your "wayward ways."
Eventually this church started a private K-12 Christian school back in the 1970-80s, which still "serves" the Chinese community in the East Bay, but they expanded and moved out of Oakland into one of the East Bay suburbs. All the while, this pastor was "counseling" specific students. He also had the following criteria of those he "counseled:"
1) Female student of the school grade 8-12
2) Parents were immigrants with limited English skills.
3) History of family brokenness such as alcoholism/addiction, ect. amongst the parents.
4) Were also consistent attenders/ preferably full time members of the church
5) Were considered "disciplinary challenged" female students either in school and/or church.
For those of you too dense to "get it," when I say this pastor "counseled" these troubled female students, I meant that he flat out sexually violated them.
In other words, this pastor had a very comfy cushy operation going on there. Even if the girls could've and would've spoken up, (and in the beginning some attempted to) the power structure he created kept his victims at bay. And it was indeed a power structure he took advantage of. He shamed his church of their Chinese heritage so much, they worshiped this guy even to the point of raising money to buy him a car. He was a "can do no wrong" in the eyes of his congregants. Calling him out would've been viewed as a sin by that community. He targeted his victims well because of the reputation of both the student and their families. Their word against his.
Basically Jared Fogle could've taken advice from this pastor. Bear in mind there was no social media during the time the pastor took advantage of those young ladies. This was during the 1980s and 90s, where Asian culture, specifically patriarchal Chinese culture was combined with this conservative independent baptist culture; therefore it wasn't conducive to come forward. Those women basically had nowhere to go. If the situation sounds eerily similar to the situation of the Cosby victims, well yes it's a combination of the power structure and the (lack of) technology and communication resources available then.
So for those who did came forward about the situation, how do you think it was handled? It was handled initially in a very similar way as the Duggars situation. No, not the recent Ashley Madison, but the other situation within the Duggar family. You see, this was a church who also advocated Institute of Basic Life Principles like the Duggars, so the solution to the situation were handled similarly. It was a "God will deliver a solution" to all of this. Even though I don't mention nor identify the church directly, no matter how much you'd "Google" this situation, you will never see any news item on it even though it actually happened and the church is still one of the most prominent Chinese community churches in the San Francisco East Bay Area. The most they did was remove him as pastor after all the damage was done.
I know, I'm an IBLP "alumni." In fact while re-auditing the IBLP seminar 20 years ago, I ran into one of the pastor's past victim. She was taking the courses in order to "heal" her life. So it doesn't surprise me at all that the Duggar family handled their situation the way they did initially. The way IBLP is structured and what it teaches, there's a method to the madness in how to handle every situation. Everything is a "sin" problem, so what does the Bible say about handling "sin?" Confession and forgiveness. Here's the catch: according to the IBLP, not forgiving is also a "sin." So if a Duggar or a pastor or a Fogle "confesses," the person whom they violated, if they too are part of that community or circle, must "forgive" that confessor, otherwise their "sin" of not forgiving is considered to be as bad as the "sin" the confessor confessed. Got all of that? So that's why the Duggar sisters want to move on, and that's why Josh's wife will remain his wife.
As for that Fogle dude...
I guess he should've became a Christian pastor to a community of color where English is a second language; then he could've enjoyed his perversity a little while longer before getting caught.***
***-Please note sarcasm...
As for that church, one of the aftermath footnote about it was the fact that the community was so cultured-shamed to the point that when the replacement pastor was Asian descent like the congregation members, a portion of the church split to find a "more qualified shepherd," to pastor their group. What was the "more qualified?" NOT being Asian.
28 August, 2015
Lack of Activity
There has been a lack of new entries on this blog lately, and it's not because I abandoned my spiritual journey or anything. On the contrary. I'm more immersed in it. It's just that as of now, I'm currently a Masters of Theological Studies candidate through The Samaritans Institute. The courses are short, sweet, to the point, and are well grounded in the fundamentals of New Thought Christianity.
It's what I was looking for since 2011 when I first read Eric Butterworth's Discover the Power Within You.
When I was a part of The Salvation Army's Service Corps program back in 1997, as a person who didn't complete his undergrad work, it was indirectly implied that I was to be groomed into a ministerial lifestyle. My heart has always been in the performing arts, and they offered me opportunities to perform through that channel. On the flip side, I witnessed first-hand "behind closed doors" type of ongoing regarding the ministers and I completed the program with absolutely no interest in any type of ministerial endeavors.
It may appear as a "change of heart" because I'm studying for an MTS in Divine Science as well as pursuing a Divine Science Practitioners credential, but I'm doing so because of the lack of channels to voice this teaching that I personally find valuable. It's out of necessity. Very similar when I started as an actor with absolutely no interest in writing; I began to write out of necessity after a year of auditioning for roles that did not have my best interest at heart. It's a similar situation here.
Theology and teachings that fall into the category of New Thought, has become influential not only in theology, but in business, psychology, and especially the personal development movement. Yet very few centers and churches rooted in New Thought are thriving. Outsiders may easily conclude it's because the teachings that's considered New Thought has become irrelevant and obsolete. However one needs to simply turn on Oprah Winfrey Network, Joel Olsteen, or pop in the DVD, Secret to see that elements from New Thought is a $13 BILLION a year business!
That's why it's upsetting to see the current state of New Thought churches and other establishments. I know first-hand how the teachings have benefit me, and the personal development has created a money making mechanism to become an outlet to teach what New Thought teaches, but at a price. I just simply want the teachings available to as many people as possible, period. Plus I am well aware that one of the "band-aid" approach to the current situation is that the established New Thought entities are distancing themselves from any affiliation with Christianity resulting from the media backlash such as the notoriety of Westboro Baptist Church, the Duggar scandal, and the recent John Oliver expose on the Prosperity Gospel.
That is where I disagree with such an approach.
To me, this is an opportunity to show the world that a good message, a great message can be associated with Christianity without the judgment and hypocrisy. Also, it can show and distinguishes the difference between New Thought approach to prosperity as opposed to the Prosperity Gospel, the more new agey Law of Attraction, and the more accepted "Think and Grow Rich" approaches. Yes, there are definite overlaps, but there needs to be a distinction communicated to the general public. For example, yes in New Thought tithing is important. However unlike the Prosperity Gospel, it is not a "seed" nor will you be "financially cursed by God" if you choose not to donate.
And that's another reason the urgency to help spread the message.
No one should be coerced into anything. Whether it's signing up for a personal development course, giving your time, treasure or talent, or making any sort of purchase of goods or services. What I learned from New Thought is that any actions or decisions motivated by fear will only allow the fear-based mentality and results to multiply. True religion, true spirituality is to set people free, and fear does not set anyone free.
I spent the last two years angry and frustrated with the powers that be who run the Unity establishment. They have been making decisions to the detriment of the people they're supposed to teach and to the teachings itself. But expressing that frustration will not resolve anything which is why I'm focused on what I've been focusing on lately. So I may post a response or two whenever a decision or announcement is made from them, but I will not dwell on it whether or not I think it's consistent with my perception of the teachings. There are enough resources out there to teach and reinforce the teachings. I will no longer "wait" around for any organizations to get its act together and lament out loud that I'm not learning anything because they won't, nor will I wait for any splinter group to step up and fulfill that role.
If it's truly true, it'll surface.
It's what I was looking for since 2011 when I first read Eric Butterworth's Discover the Power Within You.
When I was a part of The Salvation Army's Service Corps program back in 1997, as a person who didn't complete his undergrad work, it was indirectly implied that I was to be groomed into a ministerial lifestyle. My heart has always been in the performing arts, and they offered me opportunities to perform through that channel. On the flip side, I witnessed first-hand "behind closed doors" type of ongoing regarding the ministers and I completed the program with absolutely no interest in any type of ministerial endeavors.
It may appear as a "change of heart" because I'm studying for an MTS in Divine Science as well as pursuing a Divine Science Practitioners credential, but I'm doing so because of the lack of channels to voice this teaching that I personally find valuable. It's out of necessity. Very similar when I started as an actor with absolutely no interest in writing; I began to write out of necessity after a year of auditioning for roles that did not have my best interest at heart. It's a similar situation here.
Theology and teachings that fall into the category of New Thought, has become influential not only in theology, but in business, psychology, and especially the personal development movement. Yet very few centers and churches rooted in New Thought are thriving. Outsiders may easily conclude it's because the teachings that's considered New Thought has become irrelevant and obsolete. However one needs to simply turn on Oprah Winfrey Network, Joel Olsteen, or pop in the DVD, Secret to see that elements from New Thought is a $13 BILLION a year business!
That's why it's upsetting to see the current state of New Thought churches and other establishments. I know first-hand how the teachings have benefit me, and the personal development has created a money making mechanism to become an outlet to teach what New Thought teaches, but at a price. I just simply want the teachings available to as many people as possible, period. Plus I am well aware that one of the "band-aid" approach to the current situation is that the established New Thought entities are distancing themselves from any affiliation with Christianity resulting from the media backlash such as the notoriety of Westboro Baptist Church, the Duggar scandal, and the recent John Oliver expose on the Prosperity Gospel.
That is where I disagree with such an approach.
To me, this is an opportunity to show the world that a good message, a great message can be associated with Christianity without the judgment and hypocrisy. Also, it can show and distinguishes the difference between New Thought approach to prosperity as opposed to the Prosperity Gospel, the more new agey Law of Attraction, and the more accepted "Think and Grow Rich" approaches. Yes, there are definite overlaps, but there needs to be a distinction communicated to the general public. For example, yes in New Thought tithing is important. However unlike the Prosperity Gospel, it is not a "seed" nor will you be "financially cursed by God" if you choose not to donate.
And that's another reason the urgency to help spread the message.
No one should be coerced into anything. Whether it's signing up for a personal development course, giving your time, treasure or talent, or making any sort of purchase of goods or services. What I learned from New Thought is that any actions or decisions motivated by fear will only allow the fear-based mentality and results to multiply. True religion, true spirituality is to set people free, and fear does not set anyone free.
I spent the last two years angry and frustrated with the powers that be who run the Unity establishment. They have been making decisions to the detriment of the people they're supposed to teach and to the teachings itself. But expressing that frustration will not resolve anything which is why I'm focused on what I've been focusing on lately. So I may post a response or two whenever a decision or announcement is made from them, but I will not dwell on it whether or not I think it's consistent with my perception of the teachings. There are enough resources out there to teach and reinforce the teachings. I will no longer "wait" around for any organizations to get its act together and lament out loud that I'm not learning anything because they won't, nor will I wait for any splinter group to step up and fulfill that role.
If it's truly true, it'll surface.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)